Instrumental & Intrinsic Value (HL IB Environmental Systems & Societies (ESS))
Revision Note
Instrumental & Intrinsic Value
Instrumental value
Instrumental value refers to the usefulness of something (i.e. an 'entity') for humans
Examples include:
Goods:
Food and water provide essential sustenance for human survival
The value of agricultural crops such as wheat and rice lies in their role as staple foods, sustaining human populations worldwide
Services:
Decomposers play a crucial role in breaking down waste and dead organisms, aiding in nutrient recycling
Bees provide the vital service of pollination, supporting the growth of various crops essential for human food production
Opportunities for human development, such as:
Something may provide knowledge and creative inspiration, which can then contribute to human development and progress
Access to education offers individuals the opportunity to acquire knowledge and skills that allow them to contribute to the advancement of society
Intrinsic value
Intrinsic value is the value we attach to something for its inherent nature, regardless of its usefulness to humans
Examples include:
Non-living objects:
Landscapes may hold intrinsic value due to their wildness, cultural significance, or aesthetic beauty
E.g. the Grand Canyon holds intrinsic value due to its stunning natural beauty and geological significance, attracting millions of visitors annually
Living organisms:
Living things possess intrinsic value because they share fundamental characteristics with humans—they have parts, processes and behaviours that are highly organised to help them survive and reproduce, so we should respect their ongoing existence and well-being
Endangered species like the giant panda are valued not only for their role in maintaining ecosystem balance but also for their unique biological characteristics, raising human interest and concern for conservation efforts
If something has intrinsic value, this can also mean it is still worth something, even if it doesn’t have any obvious economic value (monetary value)
This can sometimes be difficult to understand as in today’s society, we tend to view everything from a financial perspective—we see almost everything, including our homes, food, water, heating, electricity, recreational activities and holidays, in terms of money
Different people and different groups, with different environmental value systems, will have different parts or aspects of the environment that hold intrinsic value to them. For example:
Many places or ecosystems are important to a country’s national identity, such as Mount Fuji in Japan or Uluru (Ayers Rock) in Australia, which is of great spiritual importance to Aboriginal people
Someone who lives in a densely populated city where there is little wildlife may value the abundance of insect and plant life present if they visit the countryside on a summer’s day, as this is something they don’t normally experience
A gardener, who is always interacting with insects and plants, may value these things for slightly different reasons; for example, they may value the services that the insects provide (e.g. their ability to recycle the dead leaves and pollinate the flowers in their garden)
Moral Standing
Morals are principles or beliefs about what is right or wrong, guiding individuals in their behaviour and decision-making, often influenced by cultural, religious, or personal values
Moral standing refers to whether an entity should be considered moral in our actions towards it
For example, if we ask whether animals have moral standing, we are questioning whether their well-being should matter in our decisions regarding how we treat them
Ecocentric perspectives
Ecocentrists argue that all living things have moral standing due to their intrinsic value
For example, trees, animals and even whole ecosystems like forests are seen as having moral standing or moral significance
Some ecocentrists go further and extend moral standing to non-living aspects of the environment, such as rivers, rocks and landscapes
For example, it could be argued that the debate over the construction of dams on rivers should involve considering the moral standing of the river itself as well as the potential harm caused to ecosystems and biotic communities downstream
Aldo Leopold: a pioneer in environmental ethics
Aldo Leopold (1887–1948) was an American writer, philosopher, naturalist, scientist, ecologist, forester, conservationist and environmentalist
Leopold's experiences in the early 20th century, including witnessing the degradation of natural landscapes and the systematic shooting of top predators, shaped his views on conservation and ethics
His influential essay, "The Land Ethic", published as a chapter in his book "A Sand County Almanack" (1949), outlined a moral framework for human interactions with the land where they live
He argued that ethical behaviour should extend beyond human-to-human relationships to include respect and consideration for the land and its non-human inhabitants
Leopold proposed that the health and integrity of the biotic community—made up of all living organisms and their habitats—should be central to ethical decision-making
According to Leopold, actions that promote the stability and beauty of ecosystems are morally right, while those that degrade them are morally wrong
Consideration for future generations
Considering the moral standing of future generations raises questions about our responsibilities and moral obligations towards them
For example, do we have a duty towards future human individuals and societies, even if it doesn't directly benefit us today?
If we consider future generations to have moral standing, we do have a duty to consider them in the actions we take today
Increasingly, environmental policies addressing climate change and sustainable development aim to ensure that future generations will inherit a habitable planet
This demonstrates moral considerations beyond present human interests
Did this page help you?