Syllabus Edition

First teaching 2015

Last exams 2025

|

Contrasting Environmental Value Systems

Alistair Marjot

Written by: Alistair Marjot

Reviewed by: Bridgette Barrett

Further EVS Categories

  • The spectrum of environmental value systems (from ecocentrism to anthropocentrism to technocentrism) can be broken down into further categories

    • These categories can either be extreme forms of a particular end of the EVS spectrum (such as deep ecologists and cornucopians), or they can lie somewhere between two EVSs (such as soft ecologists and environmental managers) as they contain a mixture of different values and perspectives from the three broader EVS categories

  • EVSs vary greatly depending on cultures and time periods

    • This means that in reality, they rarely fit simply or perfectly into any single EVS classification

Fo2KKQb6_1-1-4-evs-extremes

Ecocentrism, anthropocentrism and technocentrism can be divided into further EVS categories

Deep Ecologists

  • View nature as having intrinsic value beyond its usefulness to humans

  • Believe in preserving biodiversity and ecosystems as a moral obligation

  • Advocate for reducing human impact on the environment and promoting sustainability

  • Prioritise the needs of the environment over those of human societies

Soft Ecologists

  • View individual responsibility and self-sufficiency in living sustainably as highly important for societies

  • Believe in reducing consumption, waste, and dependence on technology

  • Advocate for small-scale and local solutions to environmental problems

  • Prioritise self-sufficiency and personal freedom over environmental regulations

Environmental Managers

  • View the environment as a resource to be managed and conserved for human benefit

  • Believe in balancing economic development with environmental protection

  • Advocate for regulations and policies that promote sustainable resource use

  • Prioritise the needs of human societies over those of the environment

Cornucopians

  • View the environment as a resource to be exploited for human benefit

  • Believe in human ingenuity and technological advancements to overcome environmental problems

  • Advocate for economic growth and development as a means to address environmental issues

  • Prioritise the needs of human societies over those of the environment

Strengths and Limitations of Contrasting EVSs

EVS

Advantages

Disadvantages

Ecocentrism

(Deep ecologists)

  • Reuses materials so more sustainable 

  • Minimises environmental impact by encouraging restraint

  • Better for long-term human wellbeing

  • No need to wait for technology to develop

  • Conservation can be expensive with no obvious or quick economic return

  • Many countries are still developing economically and argue they should be allowed to continue

  • Difficult to change individual attitudes

Technocentrism

(Cornucopians)

  • Substitutes materials so avoids costly industrial change

  • Provides solutions so people are not inconvenienced

  • Allows social and economic progress

  • Allows even greater rates of resource consumption

  • May give rise to further environmental problems

  • High cost

  • Humans increasingly disconnected from nature

Worked Example

Plastic pollution in the oceans is a major environmental problem. Outline how humans might use an ecocentric approach and a technocentric approach to try and solve this problem.

Answer

The problem of plastic pollution in the oceans can be addressed using an ecocentric approach or a technocentric approach.

Ecocentric Approach:

The ecocentric approach prioritises the preservation of natural ecosystems and biodiversity. In the context of plastic pollution, an ecocentric approach would focus on reducing the amount of plastic waste that enters the oceans in the first place.

This could involve reducing the production and use of single-use plastic items, implementing stricter regulations and enforcement to prevent illegal dumping of plastic waste into the oceans, and promoting sustainable alternatives to plastic products. Additionally, an ecocentric approach would prioritise the restoration and protection of marine ecosystems that have been impacted by plastic pollution, such as coral reefs and sea turtle nesting habitats

Technocentric Approach:

The technocentric approach relies on technological solutions to environmental problems. In the context of plastic pollution, a technocentric approach would focus on developing new technologies to clean up plastic waste from the oceans and prevent further pollution.

This could involve the use of advanced filtration systems or autonomous robots to remove plastic waste from the oceans, as well as the development of biodegradable plastics that break down more quickly in marine environments.

Overall, the ecocentric approach emphasises the need for systemic change (fundamental changes in human behaviour and resource use) in order to reduce the amount of plastic waste entering the oceans and preserve marine ecosystems, while the technocentric approach focuses on developing new technologies to address the problem (allowing current rates of plastic use to continue).

Last updated:

Did this page help you?