Environmental Impacts of Economic Growth (DP IB Environmental Systems & Societies (ESS))
Revision Note
Environmental Impacts of Economic Growth
Economic growth is generally seen as a positive indicator of a country's prosperity and development
It is associated with higher incomes, improved living standards, and increased employment opportunities
However, economic growth has implications for the environment
As economies expand, they interact more extensively with natural resources and ecosystems, leading to various environmental impacts
Positive and negative impacts on environmental welfare
Positive impacts:
Economic growth often brings about advancements in technology and innovation that can benefit the environment (or at least reduce the damage caused to it)
For example, the development of renewable energy sources like solar and wind power can reduce reliance on fossil fuels
Higher incomes from economic growth can also lead to increased investment in environmental protection measures
For example, governments might provide greater funds for wastewater treatment plants to reduce water pollution
Negative impacts:
Increased consumption of non-renewable resources, such as coal and oil, by economies leads to their rapid depletion
This can lead to scarcity and higher prices, negatively affecting the economy
This also results in greater greenhouse gas emissions, leading to global warming and climate change, with negative consequences such as rising sea levels and extreme weather events
Pollution levels may rise due to increased industrial activity and transportation
For example, factories emitting pollutants into the air or rivers can harm ecosystems and human health
China's rapid economic growth over the past few decades has led to severe air and water pollution in many cities due to increased industrial activity and reliance on coal for energy production
As economies grow, the loss of natural habitats happens as land is cleared for urbanisation, agriculture, or industrial development
This threatens biodiversity and disrupts ecosystems
For example, cattle ranching and soybean farming in the Amazon rainforest contribute to deforestation, threaten biodiversity and worsen climate change
Impacts on vulnerable communities:
The environmental impacts of economic growth and increasing consumption of natural resources unfairly affects marginalised communities (i.e. these communities feel the impacts more strongly)
For example, industrial pollution tends to be concentrated in poorer neighbourhoods, leading to environmental injustice (as this may negatively affect the health of people living in these communities)
Communities reliant on natural resources for their livelihoods, such as Indigenous peoples, may suffer from environmental degradation caused by economic activities like mining or deforestation
For example, Indigenous communities in the Amazon often rely on the forest for their livelihoods, including hunting, fishing, gathering, and agriculture (as well as the cultural and spiritual significance the forest holds for them)
Deforestation reduces the availability of these resources, threatening their traditional way of life, cultural identity and food security
Eco-Economic Decoupling
Eco-economic decoupling refers to the idea of separating economic growth from environmental degradation
In other words, it involves achieving economic prosperity without harming the environment
Whilst eco-economic decoupling is desirable, achieving it is very challenging
Possibilities and limitations
Absolute decoupling:
This refers to the theoretical concept of achieving indefinite economic growth with zero increase in environmental degradation
Some argue that technological advancements and efficiency improvements could one day make this possible. For example:
Advancements in energy-efficient appliances, vehicles, and industrial processes can reduce energy consumption per unit of economic output, potentially leading to decoupling
Developments in renewable energy technologies such as solar panels and wind turbines enable cleaner energy production, reducing reliance on fossil fuels and carbon emissions
Strategies like smart grids and sustainable urban planning can improve resource efficiency and reduce environmental impact while supporting economic growth
However, achieving absolute decoupling on a global scale remains a seemingly impossible task
Relative decoupling:
In relative decoupling, economic growth is accompanied by a reduction in the rate of environmental degradation
Although this is a more feasible scenario, it is a compromise as it still allows for some level of environmental impact
Resource constraints:
Continuous (indefinite) economic growth faces limitations due to finite natural resources
For example, fossil fuel resources will not be available forever, even with technological improvements in the efficiency of locating and extracting them
Sustainable development aims to balance economic growth with environmental preservation by considering the finite nature of resources and the need to protect ecosystems
Real-world examples of eco-economic decoupling
Renewable energy transitions:
Countries investing in renewable energy sources like wind, solar, and hydroelectric power aim to decouple economic growth from carbon emissions
For example, Denmark has made significant progress in wind energy production whilst maintaining its economic growth
Circular economy initiatives:
Some companies and even whole countries are adopting circular economy principles, which emphasise resource efficiency, recycling, and waste reduction
For example, the Netherlands has introduced policies to encourage the use of circular economy-type strategies in various industries, aiming to decouple economic growth from resource depletion
These policies mainly promote recycling and reuse of materials in industries like manufacturing and construction
Did this page help you?