Porter's Generic Strategies
- Porter’s Generic Matrix identifies a range of strategies a business can utilise to increase their success
- The matrix considers two factors
- Its source of competitive advantage (cost or differentiation)
- The scope of the market in which it operates (mass or niche)
- Porter's generic strategies provide a clear framework for businesses to determine the most appropriate strategy to succeed in the mass market or within a smaller niche market
- It emphasises the importance of developing distinctive capabilities and avoid being 'stuck in the middle'
A Diagram to show Porters Generic Matrix
Porter's generic matrix identifies suitable strategies for mass and niche markets
- The model encourages businesses to make strategic choices that are difficult for competitors to copy
- Pursuing one strategy forces the business to make explicit choices about its direction and concentrate on it
- The model does not offer guidance to businesses on specific tactics or implementation
- The model often overlooks external factors such as technological change, economic conditions and changes in laws which could impact competitive position
Stuck in the Middle
- Porter argued that failing to adopt one of the strategies risks a business being ‘stuck in the middle'
- This means it is unable to compete successfully with rivals in the market because each strategy is different
- A business should select its strategy and concentrate its resources on pursuing it rather than simply responding to its competitors actions
- Pursuing a mixture of strategies is also not feasible in the long term
- For example, cost leadership and differentiation are unlikely to be financially compatible
- Low prices combined with high quality can negatively affect consumer perceptions of the product
- For example, cost leadership and differentiation are unlikely to be financially compatible